Chimezie Metu of the Sacramento Kings, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Chimezie Metu
Sacramento Kings
2021-2022 NBA Season

More Chimezie Metu stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
25%	-21	1.09	1.13	-3.4	5	8	38.5

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 3.3 8.4 .394 .463 79% 9% .8 8.6

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 70% .388   82% 7% 4.5

Close 14% .400   67% 27% .9

Dunk 17% .833   80% 6% 2.3

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 30% .636   76% 15% 3.2

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 47% .373   71% 8% 2.9

11-15 30% .485   86% 6% 2.5

16-20 15% .625   75% 13% 1.5

21+ 8% .611   100% 22% .8

Crunch 23% .620   83% 16% 2.4

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
11	15	73.3	2.4	1.8	117	8	6.8%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
6	1	2	5	14	5	2.8	3.4	2.3

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
14	323	4.3%	28.8%	73	317	23.0%	71.6%	27.4	100.4

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	9	2	%	5%	6%	12	1.9	2.1%	3	4.00	7.6

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
3	5	6		11.6

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Fox-Haliburton-Barnes-Metu-Holmes	59	1.07	1.07	1	2	3	40
2	Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Metu-Holmes	41	1.10	.98	9	2	0	100
3	Fox-Haliburton-Hield-Metu-Thompson	15	1.00	1.03	-2	2	3	40
4	Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Metu-Len	13	1.00	1.13	-4	1	2	33
5	Fox-Haliburton-Hield-Metu-Holmes	11	1.35	1.42	-3	1	2	33
6	Fox-Hield-Barnes-Metu-Holmes	9	1.33	1.61	-5	1	3	25
7	Fox-Haliburton-Barnes-Metu-Thompson	8	1.30	1.52	-6	1	2	33
8	Fox-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Len	8	.74	1.33	-10	0	2	0
9	Mitchell-Davis-Hield-Metu-Jones	7	.86	.93	-1	2	1	66
10	Fox-Mitchell-Barnes-Metu-Holmes	7	.88	.89	-1	1	1	50
11	Haliburton-Mitchell-Davis-Metu-Holmes	7	1.47	1.00	7	1	1	50
12	Fox-Mitchell-Barnes-Metu-Jones	7	1.33	.27	16	1	0	100
13	Fox-Hield-Barnes-Metu-Thompson	6	1.67	.67	10	2	0	100
14	Haliburton-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Thompson	6	1.36	1.00	3	1	0	100
15	Ramsey-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Jones	5	1.91	1.80	3	1	0	100
16	Fox-Haliburton-Hield-Metu-Len	5	.62	1.55	-9	1	3	25
17	Fox-Davis-Hield-Metu-Thompson	5	1.17	1.42	-3	0	2	0
18	Fox-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Holmes	4	1.11	1.50	-2	1	1	50
19	Fox-Mitchell-Barnes-Metu-Thompson	4	.70	1.67	-8	0	1	0
20	Haliburton-Mitchell-Harkless-Metu-Holmes	4	1.00	1.00	-1	0	1	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Fox-Haliburton-Barnes-Metu-Holmes .470 .470 +3 42% 31%   53% +3%

2 Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Metu-Holmes .510 .420 -4 29% 26%   44% +1%

3 Fox-Haliburton-Hield-Metu-Thompson .370 .400 +3 37% 31%   58% -7%

4 Fox-Haliburton-Davis-Metu-Len .420 .480 +7 38% 34%   39% +7%

5 Fox-Haliburton-Hield-Metu-Holmes .450 .560 +6 25% 48%   61% -13%

6 Fox-Hield-Barnes-Metu-Holmes .560 .690 0 33% 44%   59% 0%

7 Fox-Haliburton-Barnes-Metu-Thompson .650 .580 -3 59% 21%   39% -6%

8 Fox-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Len .390 .630 0 38% 38%   29% -4%

9 Mitchell-Davis-Hield-Metu-Jones .390 .360 -1 38% 43%   46% 0%

10 Fox-Mitchell-Barnes-Metu-Holmes .420 .460 +4 33% 54%   63% -1%

11 Haliburton-Mitchell-Davis-Metu-Holmes .620 .380 +3 46% 31%   35% +14%

12 Fox-Mitchell-Barnes-Metu-Jones .750 .180 +8 63% 36%   57% +13%

13 Fox-Hield-Barnes-Metu-Thompson .500 .290 +4 42% 50%   66% +6%

14 Haliburton-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Thompson .420 .500 0 17% 25%   71% +6%

15 Ramsey-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Jones .750 .640 -5 25% 64%   37% 0%

16 Fox-Haliburton-Hield-Metu-Len .250 .550 -2 17% 27%   25% +2%

17 Fox-Davis-Hield-Metu-Thompson .550 .500 0 45% 36%   25% +8%

18 Fox-Mitchell-Hield-Metu-Holmes .570 .500 +1 29% 30%   47% -33%

19 Fox-Mitchell-Barnes-Metu-Thompson .200 .600 +2 10% 50%   63% -30%

20 Haliburton-Mitchell-Harkless-Metu-Holmes .500 .380 +3 17% 38%   47% +21%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG
SG
SF
PF	25%	-17	109.1	111.7	-2.7	5	8	38%
C	0%	-5	125.2	158.2	-33.0	1	3	25%

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG
SG
SF
PF	17.5	.481	2.5	31%	14.1	2.2	2.2	2.0	2.3	18.6	16.2
C	26.4	.000	.0	0%	13.2	6.6	6.6	.0	6.6	.0	.0

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF 18.0 .588 2.3 29% 8.8 4.2 2.5 1.7 2.5 22.8 20.1

C 19.8 .667 13.2 66% .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 39.5 32.3

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG

SG

SF

PF -.5 -.107 .2 2% 5.3 -2.0 .3 .3 .2 -4.2 -3.9

C 6.6 -.667 -13.2 -66% 13.2 6.6 -6.6 .0 -6.6 -39.5 -32.3

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
8%	-2	38.9	58.4	-19.5	0	1	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 9.7 9.7 1.000 .000 0% 0% 0.0 0.0

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 100% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
0	0	0.0	9.7	0.0	1	0	0.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-19.5	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	5	0.0%	20.0%	2	7	28.6%	85.7%	28.6	105.7

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	1	0	-28.7

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	295	850	25%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	109.5	111.0	-1.5
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	112.0	113.6	-1.5
Net Points per 100 Possessions	-2.6	-2.6	+0.0
Points Scored	675	1960	-1285
Points Allowed	696	2011	-1315
Net Points	-21	-51	+30
Effective FG%	52.1%	51.0%	+1.1%
Effective FG% Allowed	53.9%	51.5%	+2.4%
Assisted Field Goals	53%	56%	-3%
Assisted FG% Allowed	57%	54%	+3%
Own Shots Blocked	6%	5%	+1%
Shots Blocked	6%	4%	+2%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	28.8%	26.9%	+1.9%
Defensive Rebounding	71.6%	70.1%	+1.5%
Total Rebounding	50.2%	48.5%	+1.7%
Stats
Free Throws Made	13	18	-5
Free Throws Attempted	18	24	-6
Free Throws Made by Opp.	11	18	+7
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	14	24	+10
Turnovers, on Offense	15	13	-2
Turnovers, on Defense	15	13	+2
Net Turnovers	0	0	+0
Fouls Committed	17	20	+3
Fouls, Drawn	17	20	-3
Net Fouls	0	0	+0

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts